Blockwork house: The Pros & Cons of Concrete Block House Construction | Home Guides
Ten tactile home interiors featuring exposed concrete blockwork
From a skinny house in Brazil to a pair of industrial residences in England, our latest lookbook rounds up 10 home interiors that celebrate the tactility of concrete blockwork.
Typically hidden behind plasterboard, blockwork is a common form of masonry construction that uses chunky concrete blocks to create load-bearing or non-load-bearing walls.
However, many designers from around the world opt to expose the blockwork instead, creating tactile interiors and minimalist backdrops for the owners’ possessions, while also reducing construction costs and times.
This is the latest roundup in our Dezeen Lookbooks series that provide visual inspiration for designers and design enthusiasts. Previous lookbooks include homes with exposed brickwork, texture-heavy restaurants and dark and moody interiors.
Photo is by Tom Ross
Mt Coot-Tha House, Australia, by Nielsen Jenkins
The high blockwork walls of the Mt Coot-Tha House in Brisbane were designed by Nielsen Jenkins to help protect the home from bushfires.
Inside, portions of the blockwork are left uncovered, complemented by white walls and wooden furnishings. In the dining area, it forms a minimalist backdrop for a slender wooden table and a trio of black Wishbone Chairs designed by Hans J Wegner.
Find out more about Mt Coot-Tha House ›
Photo is by Pedro Kok
Maracanã House, Brazil, by Terra e Tuma
Exposed concrete blocks contribute to the industrial aesthetic of the Maracanã House, which Brazilian architecture studio Terra e Tuma created for its director’s family in São Paulo.
The solidity of the blockwork, which features throughout, is juxtaposed by large expanses of glass and wooden furniture, alongside indoor plants and slender staircases with metal bannisters.
Find out more about Maracanã House ›
Photo is by Amit Geron
Bare House, Israel, by Jacobs-Yaniv Architects
Clerestory windows sit on top of the concrete masonry at the Bare House, which Jacobs-Yaniv Architects’ founders Tamar Jacobs and Oshri Yaniv built for themselves on the coast of Herzlia.
The blockwork is revealed internally to create continuity between inside and outside, where the blocks are also exposed. The material also requires little maintenance.
Find out more about Bare House ›
Photo is by Ståle Eriksen
King’s Grove, UK, by Al-Jawad Pike
Ivory-hued blockwork is the centre of attention in this Peckham house extension, which studio Al-Jawad Pike designed on a limited budget for the brother of its co-founder.
The pigmented blocks, which also line the exterior of the dwelling, were chosen for being a robust and economical material. They were installed with a matching flush mortar and are married with white-oiled oak detailing and polished concrete floors.
Find out more about King’s Grove ›
Photo is by James Brittain
Catching Sun House, UK, by Studioshaw
Timber plank cladding offers a counterpoint to the blockwork base of the Catching Sun House, which London architect Studioshaw designed for a hidden infill site in Walthamstow.
The concrete blocks, which are joined with bright white mortar, are exposed both inside and outside the dwelling for an industrial look. They are brightened by white mortar, timber-lined ceilings and colourful furniture including five DSR Side Chairs by Charles and Ray Eames.
Find out more about Catching Sun House ›
Photo is by Pedro Kok
Villa Matilde, Brazil, by Terra e Tuma
Brazilian studio Terra e Tuma revealed the blockwork structure of Villa Matilde, a skinny house designed for an elderly woman living in São Paulo.
The masonry blocks enabled the studio to work to a strict budget and build the house quickly. Exposing the blockwork also adds tactility to the interiors, which have been kept deliberately simple with few furnishings to suit the limited mobility of its owner.
Find out more about Villa Matilde ›
Photo is by Tom Kahler
Twin-build, UK, by CODA Bespoke
Uncovered blockwork features throughout this pair of houses that CODA Bespoke designed for twin brothers on the site of an old corn mill in Sheffield.
The two dwellings have unique layouts but are unified by their industrial aesthetic that was achieved using a material palette of concrete blocks, plywood and steel. While being low maintenance, these materials were chosen as a nod to the site’s industrial heritage.
Find out more about Twin-build ›
Photo is by Eric Bossic
House K, Japan, by TANK
At House K in Tokyo, Japanese architecture studio TANK used concrete blocks to construct a series of bespoke kitchen and storage units that suit its client’s “brutal taste”.
In other areas of the apartment, the blocks have been used to build low partition walls. In tandem with sheer curtains, these partitions define boundaries between rooms without truncating the space.
Find out more about House K ›
Photo is by Shantanu Starick
K&T’s Place, Australia, by Nielsen Jenkins
A combination of untreated timber and bare concrete masonry characterises this pared-back cottage extension that Nielsen Jenkins designed for an artist and art gallery director in Brisbane.
While the material palette was dictated by the client’s restricted budget, the texture of the blockwork helped to create the extension’s centrepiece – a statement fireplace that rises up through its centre and pierces through the roof.
Find out more about K&T’s Place ›
Photo is by Amanda Kirkpatrick
Catskills House, USA, by J_spy
Dark uncovered blockwork constructed with bright white mortar forms the monolithic lower ground of the Catskills House, a family holiday home in Upstate New York.
Architecture studio J_spy reduced the visual impact of the concrete internally by breaking it up with large windows that frame its bucolic surroundings and introducing bolts of colour with art and furniture.
Find out more about Catskills House ›
The main image is of Catching Sun House by James Brittain.
This is the latest in our series of lookbooks providing curated visual inspiration from Dezeen’s image archive. For more inspiration see previous lookbooks showcasing home libraries, Shaker-style rooms and stylish plywood interiors.
Does Blockwork Still Make Sense for Self Builders?
Log In
Share article:
Login/register to save Article for later
Build It
Chris Bates takes a look at how conventional cavity walling is being adapted to meet the exacting demands of modern construction
by Chris Bates
12th March 2020
Masonry is still the most common system for new housebuilding in the UK – but other options are nibbling away market share.
In the self build space, modern pre-manufactured solutions are steadily growing in popularity, for instance. And yet some element of blockwork makes it into pretty much every home – whatever the primary construction method – whether it’s in the form of a beam and block ground floor structure or a load-bearing internal partition.
The spoiler alert here is that, for many projects, masonry (and cavity walling in particular) is still a reliable option. So before we get into some of the challenges facing good old block construction, it’s worth a quick refresher on some of the built-in benefits this system can offer self builders:
Familiarity
You’ll be hard-pressed to meet an architect, main contractor or trade who doesn’t understand how to create and work with a good-quality masonry home. So you can expect plenty of choice in terms of who makes up your build team. The core materials are all readily available from local builders’ merchants at the drop of a hat, too.
Learn more: Sourcing Trades
Design choice
You can realise any house design with a blockwork construction system – especially if you pair it with concrete floor structures to enable features like big open-plan layouts. The fact it’s made up of small, individual components makes it a good choice for extensions and new build projects with tight access, too. Externally, you can choose anything from brick as the outer leaf (usually cheapest) through to render, timber, metal and more.
Most self build and extension projects get out of the ground on blockwork footings
Price
As Build It’s online self build cost calculator (www.self-build.co.uk/calculator) shows, brick and block is a highly cost-effective system – typically on a par with or cheaper than its closest rival, timber frame. That’s partly thanks to its popularity and the availability of good trades who know how to make the most of masonry.
Thermal mass
Blockwork can absorb warmth from the sun, heating systems and general living and radiate it back out again when internal temperatures drop. This can help create a predictable, even heating cycle – and is one of the key reasons it’s often specified in areas of houses that have been primarily built using other construction systems.
Acoustic performance
We’re now more aware of how our homes can support our wellbeing, and a big part of that is sound transfer – whether it’s noise from in or outside the house. Blockwork walls are dense, so it’s easy to deliver a quiet home. The system lends itself to using concrete floor structures that deaden noise transfer between storeys, too.
Learn more: How to Create a Quiet Home
Cavity wall basicsBuilding with cavity walling is an on-site process, whereby two skins of masonry (usually of brick and block) are constructed with an air gap in between. The system was developed to improve weather resistance: the cavity reduces the risk of water penetration. These days, we partially or fully fill this void with insulation to achieve better energy efficiency. The load bearing job is done by the inner blockwork skin, which is usually constructed first (although it is possible to build up both leaves in tandem). Next, your contractor will lay the external brickwork, inserting cavity wall ties at regular intervals (as per your engineer’s design) to stitch the structure together. As the walls go up, insulation is fitted to hit the desired performance level. The outer skin doesn’t have to be built in brick: a block leaf can provide a substrate for render or other claddings, for instance. Most masonry self builds feature aircrete blocks, which are lightweight and quick to install – so they’re popular with bricklayers. They offer better insulation qualities than traditional dense concrete blocks, alongside moderate thermal mass to help regulate internal temperatures, and require around 25% less embodied energy to produce. |
Blockwork challenges & solutions
As Building Regulations tighten up, and more self builders look to achieve very high levels of energy efficiency in their homes, the merits of traditional cavity walling have come under greater scrutiny.
Steel reinforcement is sometimes embedded into blockwork mortar beds to give greater strength and allow for a thinner wall profile
And the questions don’t just stop at how easy it is to deliver good thermal performance. So let’s look at how the system is evolving to accommodate some of the modern self builder’s key requirements:
Insulation & wall thickness
Pack enough insulation into the cavity, and you can hit any performance level you want with masonry builds. But, traditionally, the downside has been that you’ll generally need slightly thicker walls to achieve a given level of efficiency than you might with other systems.
Let’s take the example of the notional dwelling set out in Part L of the Building Regs, which provides an example of how a new build house can meet the basic energy efficiency requirements. This benchmark is based on a wall U-value of 0.18 Watts per square metre (W/m2K).
To achieve that with a standard brick-faced cavity wall, the total wall thickness needs to be 350mm (plus internal service voids and plasterboard). This would be made up of two skins of 100mm-thick masonry, and either 100mm of partial-fill rigid insulation (with a 50mm residual air gap) or 150mm of full-fill mineral wool. Timber-based systems can get to the same level with a wall profile of around 300mm (including external cladding). What’s that mean in practice? Well, thinner walls translate into more internal floor space.
You might be wondering why you can’t just go for a full fill of high-quality rigid insulation. After all, get rid of that air gap and you’d be able to knock off the 50mm difference in total wall thickness. Well, the good news is there are now several products that allow you to do pretty much just that – Kingspan’s Kooltherm K106 and EcoTherm’s Eco-Cavity require a residual air gap of just 10mm.
Upgrades to other components can also improve overall performance. One example is low-conductivity wall ties that reduce thermal bridging (where useful heat escapes across materials that ‘bridge’ the structural envelope).
Build speed & system choice
Standard cavity walls are slow to build, as the mortar needs time to cure and the process is weather-sensitive. A house shell that could be erected in two weeks with timber frame might take several months in blockwork (though you won’t have the eight-week lead time for factory manufacture).
If you’re project managing, this extra time could give you breathing room to spot and resolve issues. But many self builders prefer to get the house shell weathertight as quickly as possible, so follow-on trades can get in.
One way to speed up the process is to switch to a thin-joint system, which combines large-format aircrete blocks with a special quick-drying adhesive, rather than the traditional 10mm-thick mortar. This can knock several weeks off a typical masonry build – although it’s likely to be around 5% more expensive. A variation on the theme is Wienerberger’s clay-based Porotherm interlocking system, which requires a 1mm bed joint and no mortar at the sides. It’s popular in Europe and allows storey height to be reached in as little as a day on straightforward projects.
This clay block system features interlocking profiles to reduce mortar requirements
A left-field option is blockwork specialist Forterra’s pre-fabricated panelised system, which offers factory manufacture of full sections of walling up to 9m long and 2.6m high for fast and efficient installation. This route has the potential to cut down on waste, too, which could be a boon for your project’s sustainability credentials.
Incidentally, the concrete industry is acutely aware of concerns about the embodied energy used to make blocks. There’s still work to do, but modern options contain a higher proportion of recycled content – and there’s an argument that masonry’s longevity can make for a lower lifetime carbon footprint than some lightweight systems.
Construction accuracy
Prefab methods like timber frame and structural insulated panels (SIPs) are pre-fitted with insulation and often follow-on products, such as windows, in factory conditions. They’re usually designed, supplied and erected by one company, too – so you know exactly what the finished performance level should be, and who’s responsible for delivering it.
Cavity blockwork, by contrast, is a site-based system reliant on the quality of your build team’s work. In other words, there’s more room for human error – with the possible exception of Forterra’s panelised setup, and the all-in-one turnkey route offered by the likes of CB Homes, where they take care of completing the entire project.
Is the insulation properly fitted, for example? Mineral wool can slump, while rigid products need to be neatly cut to give full coverage. Have any splashes of mortar (known as snots) landed on the wall ties, potentially creating a path for water to cross into the structural internal leaf? Are ties and movement joints incorporated in the right places?
Another critical area is airtightness. The 10mm mortar bed is a weak point here, so switching to thin-joint can make things easier to manage. You’ll also need to pay attention to junctions between structural materials, eg at window openings and the interface between joists and the inner block skin. Air tightness tapes and membranes will be needed to maintain a robust long-term barrier.
Getting these things right tends to require a lot more supervision on site than factory-based build methods, so it’s always wise to engage an experienced contractor with a proven track record. Thankfully, there are plenty of those around – but if you’re aiming for very high levels of energy efficiency and build quality, you may want backup from your architect or a professional project manager.
Photography
/
Published
12th March 2020
You may be interested in
A Guide to Blockwork | Homebuilding
(Image credit: Getty)
Why Blockwork?
The issue of whether to build with masonry or timber frame is a hot topic in the self-build world, where a growing number of homes are built of timber frame, in contrast to mass housing, which is almost exclusively brick and block.
The difference lies in the fact that timber frame houses can be prefabricated off site, which means that there are a large number of specialist timber frame manufacturers who cater directly to self-builders.
Yet, brick and block has several benefits. For a start, it offers higher levels of thermal mass and, when well insulated, can be just as energy efficient as timber. It’s also a well-understood system, meaning there are no shortage of builders or materials available locally. But perhaps most of all, advocates of masonry enjoy the inherent sense of solidity and soundproofing that the material offers.
The Big Issues
- Insulation. With the exception of ICF (insulated concrete formwork), blockwork is typically insulated by means of a creating a cavity, where a double skin of blocks (usually one of brickwork) sandwiches insulation. Due to recent changes to the Building Regulations, this cavity probably needs to be at least 125mm wide.
- Airtightness is likely to be the biggest issue facing blockwork in the coming years – with the Government pushing us towards building even more airtight homes – as it does not lend itself to an airtight structure as well as timber frame or SIPs (structural insulated panels). Simple measures can, however, be taken to increase airtightness, such as the use of special tapes and membranes.
Option One: Aircrete
Summary: Ultra-lightweight blocks made by pressure cooking air into concrete. Have dominated the housebuilding industry since the 1980s.
Pros: Loved by brickies because they are easy to handle, easy to cut and forgiving to lay. Because they are so light, they provide reasonable insulation and therefore can be used to lower U-values in walls.
Cons: Plasterers are not so fond of aircrete as they report issues with movement and cracking. There are two ways around this: one is to use plasterboard stuck onto the walls (dot and dab), the other is to add fibre reinforcement to the plaster.
Cost: Around £20/m2
Contacts: Celcon , Thermalite and Durox
Option Two: Thin Joint
Summary: Uses aircrete blocks, but does away with the conventional 10mm beds of cement mortar, instead using a 2-3mm glue mortar, similar in characteristics to tile adhesive.
Pros: It sets very rapidly and thus enables blocklayers to use much larger blocks and to build them into walls much faster, thus saving on labour costs. When used wisely, it can add many of the benefits of off-site methods (i.e. timber frame), such as fast construction.
Cons: The materials are more expensive, but this is offset by lower labour costs.
Cost: Around £20/m2
Contacts: The above manufacturers all offer solutions, each of them subtly different.
Option Three: Concrete
Summary: Traditional (pre-aircrete) concrete blockwork is still widely used. There are many manufacturers and lots of varieties of block, some denser than others and some designed for foundations.
Pros: It’s slightly cheaper than aircrete and is often preferred in foundations and beam and block floors, and where you want a fair-faced blockwork finish. Good for achieving high thermal mass.
Cons: Is more labour-intensive to work with than aircrete and requires thicker insulation.
Cost: Approx £18/m2
Contacts: Cemex and Masterblock
Option Four: ICF
ICF (insulated concrete formwork) systems are based around hollow polystyrene blocks which are assembled into a wall before readymix concrete is poured into the hollow core. So, you start with the insulation and add the concrete later.
Pros: You get a super-insulated and airtight structure that’s simple to build — indeed, some ICFs are designed to be built by unskilled labour. It works very well with rendered external finishes and can work out cheaper than traditional blockwork overall.
Cons: It can be expensive to add certain claddings such as brickwork.
Cost: £40/m2 but includes insulation.
Contacts: BecoWallform , Logix and Polarwall
Making the Decision
Most self-builders opting for blockwork will choose aircrete, with or without utilising the thin-joint system. Being lightweight, the blocks are far easier to lay, making it a popular system with bricklayers. However, that’s not to say that dense concrete doesn’t have its advantages — with designers looking to incorporate high levels of thermal mass, this is an ideal material which effectively allows the house to store and regulate internal heat.
If you are hoping to be more heavily involved on a DIY?basis, ICF might be the system for you, as it is fairly simple to construct walls before the concrete is poured. Additionally, there’s no need to buy additional wall insulation, and it’s a lot more airtight than traditional masonry.
Other blocks: Durisol, Clay, Marmox?
Durisol blocks are made from 80% recycled wood, treated not to rot or burn — a sort of natural ICF.
Clay blocks are very popular on the Continent and are available in the UK to be laid in thin-joint format, promising excellent insulation and airtightness. ThermoPlan Zeigel, Porotherm and Bouyer Leroux’s BioBric are all worth investigating.
Check out the Marmox Thermoblock, a load-bearing polystyrene/concrete hybrid block designed to be used at the base of blockwork walls to stop heat leaking out at the junction.
Mark is the author of the ever-popular Housebuilder’s Bible and an experienced builder. The Housebuilder’s Bible is the go-to hardback for self builders; originally published in 1994, it is updated every two years with up-to-date build costs and information on planning and building regulations, and is currently in its 14th reiteration.
He has written for publications such as Homebuilding & Renovating for over three decades. An experienced self builder, his latest self build, a contemporary eco home built to Passivhaus principles, was created on a tight urban brownfield plot.
Which Masonry is Stronger, Brickwork or Blockwork?
givemeservice Brick work vs Block work
When considering masonry construction, you mainly have two options to choose from – brickwork or blockwork. The two are quite common in the building industry but each has its own benefits and downsides. Therefore, you have to pay attention to the pros and cons to make the right decision regarding the best masonry technique between the two.
Brickwork
Brickwork is quite common because most homeowners prefer to use it on the exterior of houses due to its aesthetic value. Apart from that, brick is quite strong and has a great ability to withstand harsh weather conditions. Although brickwork is more expensive compared to blockwork, it is still attractive for those looking for a low maintenance and long lasting walling solution.
Blockwork
Blockwork is a method of construction that uses cement blocks and large concrete. These blocks are usually larger than normal-sized bricks. However, they are lighter because they have a hollow center, which makes them easier to work with. Blocks are usually used for construction due to their ease of use and cost effectiveness. Although many options for blockwork do exist in the market, blocks are usually rendered. This means that their appearance does not really matter.
Which is Stronger between Brickwork and Blockwork?
Brickwork and blockwork are both quite strong. However, their strength is usually influenced by the quality and type of mortar used to attach them together. All concrete blocks are required to have a compressive strength of about 1900 pounds per square inch. However, many dense blocks are stronger than this. This is because the average concrete block can withstand 3500psi and the average brick should withstand about 3000psi.
Other Factors to Consider When Choosing Between Brickwork and Blockwork
You need to have a look at many other factors when selecting between brickwork and blockwork. This part of the article looks at exactly that.
- Insulation Value
Normal brick walls usually have an insulation value of about 0.2 per square inch. To compare this, plywood has an R-value of 2.5. Brickwork thus has an insulation value comparable to other wood-framed homes. On their part, normal concrete blocks have an R-value of 0.08 per square inch or close to 2.5 for the entire block. Insulated concrete blocks can see an improvement in their R-value to about 1. 3 per square inch. Air-entrained concrete blocks can have an R-value of about 3.9.
- Weight
Bricks and blocks are quite heavy. Their specific weight depends on the type of construction and the material used. 8-inch conventional blocks weight about 43 pounds each while one clay brick weight about 5 pounds. It is good to note that a lightweight concrete block can contain about 80% air, making it weigh as little as 20% of a same-sized conventional block.
- Cost
Blockwork and brickwork are both quite inexpensive compared to other types of building materials. One clay brick and one 8-inch concrete block cost between $1 and $2. However, special lightweight blocks can cost $3-$4 each. Despite this, blockwork and brickwork requires a lot of labor, which can bring up the cost significantly.
Which is the Best Masonry between Brickwork and Blockwork?
As you have seen, brickwork and blockwork can be quite different. Therefore, the choice between the two comes down to how you want to build your house, the look you want to achieve, and the flexibility you want to enjoy when building. The cost of both brick and block in your local market can also influence your choice. Some homeowners may prefer brick masonry because they are looking to have lesser maintenance in the future despite the high cost of building that they will incur. On the side, other homeowners may go for blockwork because they are looking to have less cost of construction at the onset then conduct small maintenance along the way in order to keep the blocks properly maintained.
Both brickwork and blockwork masonry are strong, durable, and fire-resistant building materials. They contain thermal mass, which makes them able to retain heat, making up for their low insulation capability. Despite these similarities, the two can be quite different. Therefore, if you are looking to construct a new home or renovate an existing one, it is a great idea to learn the differences between the two. Doing this goes a long way in enabling you to make a proper decision. This article has shown you the key differences. You should hence be well informed when looking for a strong masonry material for your house. If you are still in doubt, you might want to speak to a professional for assistance.
A Structural Engineer Explains What is a Besser Block
A Besser Block (sometimes known as a Bessa Block) is a hollow, rectangular concrete building block used in the construction of the walls of houses, offices, multi-storey apartment blocks and industrial buildings.
The usefulness of a Besser block comes from its modular sizes and easy to lay courses. The structural integrity of a Besser Block comes from steel reinforcing bars laid vertically (droppers) and horizontally (bond beams and lintels) in special Besser Blocks called “knock-out blocks”.
What is the Standard Size of a Besser Block?
Besser blocks are made to suit a nominal 200mm metric system (known as 200 series blockwork) when you take into account 10mm grout between blocks.
Off the shelf, a standard Besser Block measures 390mm long x 190mm high x 190mm wide. But when it is laid in a 10mm mortar then those dimensions become 400mm long x 200mm high (x 190mm wide).
You can also find Besser blocks in these sizes:
- 390mm long x 190mm high x 140mm wide. (known as 150 series blockwork).
- 190mm long x 190mm high x 190 wide.
- 390mm long x 190mm high x 290mm wide (300 series blockwork).
- 390mm long x 190mm high x 90mm wide (100 series bricks)
In construction, concrete Besser Blocks are stacked in layers called courses with half a block offset in what is called a stretcher bond.
Besser blocks are ‘glued’ together with cement mortar joints. This is just a concrete glue trowelled between individual blocks to hold them together.
Steel reinforcement is placed horizontally in special blocks called knockout blocks as the wall is built. Steel reinforcement is also placed vertically in some of the hollow cores once a certain height of the block wall is built.
Concrete masonry block
Once the mortar has cured, a wall height of concrete block is filled with a special, flowable mix of concrete called grout (a mix of cement, sand, and water that often uses smaller stones than normal concrete) to fill all or some of the hollow cores.
In Australia, it is now common practice to fill all of the hollow cores with grout. Even though more grout is used, builders find filling all cores with grout faster which ends up saving money.
Besser Blocks Also Known As
In other parts of the world, Besser Blocks are also known as concrete blocks, grey blocks, breeze blocks, and cinderblock construction.
In Australia, the common name for concrete blocks is Besser Block which comes from a prominent concrete block moulding equipment manufacturer, Besser.
Besser block wall with raft slab
Besser block retaining wall and raft slab
Raft slab and concrete masonry wall
Besser blocks come in a variety of sizes. The most common block widths in Australian construction are 140mm (150 Series ) and 190mm (200 Series).
What are Besser Blocks Made From?
Besser blocks are made from concrete – a mix of sand, cement, water, stones, oxides, and additives.
The holes and sides of Besser Blocks are formed in a factory using a mould. Then the blocks are steam cured, wrapped and delivered to construction sites on pallets.
What are Besser Blocks Used For?
Concrete blocks, when reinforced with vertical and horizontal steel reinforcement, are conventionally used to form external load-bearing walls in residential houses.
Concrete Besser Blocks can also be used to form retaining walls and even elevator walls in buildings up to 8 storeys.
Do Besser blocks need to be filled?
Unfilled Besser blocks do not have much strength and so yes, Besser blocks need to be filled with steel reinforcement and concrete to make them strong enough to sideways loads like wind loads.
If a Besser block is only supporting vertical down loads like the weight of a floor or a roof then unfilled blocks might be ok – but it is really unusual to have a Besser block wall that doesn’t need to be filled with concrete.
How to Build a House with Besser Blocks
When hollow concrete blockwork is reinforced with steel reinforcement and filled with concrete it becomes a very strong, durable external wall.
The best manuals for building with Besser Blocks are available at CMAA. https://www.cmaa.com.au/Technical/Manuals/technical-manuals
How to Build a Besser Block Retaining Wall
A Besser block retaining wall can be built by a builder, a landscape gardener or by a professional block layer.
The best manual we have found for the design of Besser block retaining walls is available for free from CMAA Besser Block Retaining Walls.
For walls over 1m in height in Brisbane, you’ll need a structural engineer to design and specify the walls. Yes. We can help with that.
Why Are Besser Blocks Popular?
Besser Blocks are a popular form of construction because of several useful characteristics:
- When reinforced and filled with concrete, concrete block walls provide substantial structural strength and stability in residential houses. In cyclone areas, concrete walls are used because they have excellent impact resistance and have high bracing (racking capacity).
- When partially filled, concrete blocks have useful sound and fire insulating properties.
- For those looking for a different look, fancy architectural blocks are available from some suppliers including polished face blocks. These blocks are always a bit more expensive because they are denser concrete and have to be laid neatly.
- Besser blocks when laid below ground and reinforced can be used to retain fill under the slab.
Raised raft slab on sloping site with Besser blocks under the slab level
Besser Block Alternatives
If you want to build a strong wall or retaining wall but don’t want to use Besser blocks, these are your options:
- Formed reinforced concrete. Reinforced concrete walls have to be formed up and poured and are normally built by experienced concreters. Reinforced concrete walls are extremely strong, can be built as curved walls or as straight walls, can have openings of any shape and do not need to stick to standard thicknesses as Besser blocks do. However, reinforced concrete walls are normally more expensive than Besser block walls of similar dimensions.
- Dry stack blocks. Even though some will tell you that Besser blocks can be dry-stacked it is rarely done. Reliance on a fibre-reinforced skim coat inside and out is just too hard to get right so dry stack blocks could well crack. Yes, dry stack blocks eliminate the need for a professional block layer but then dry stacking blocks is not really the work of a home DIYer – well at least it should not be.
- Pre-cast reinforced concrete walls. Precast concrete walls are poured flat on the ground and then lifted into position when the concrete has cured. They are normally used on industrial and commercial buildings where the scale of the job permits multiple panels of reinforced concrete walls to be poured in stacks and then lifted into place when all of the wall pieces have cured.
- Double brick reinforced walls. Double brick walls will traditionally be thicker than Besser block walls and the reinforcement between the leaves of brickwork must be installed carefully. This style of the wall will appeal to those looking for the aesthetic of brickwork but the strength of concrete.
- Aerated concrete blocks. Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) is light-weight concrete by the fact it is manufactured to have lots of tiny holes in the concrete. AAC can be reinforced with steel reinforcing to improve its strength. This product makes it into fewer buildings than Besser blocks because even though it is easy to cut and carry, it just doesn’t have the strength or the durability of conventional concrete blocks.
- Insulating concrete forms. These light-weight core filled blocks are stacked by hand and then filled with reinforcement and concrete. They have handy insulating properties and can be cut on-site to suit the wall layout. Their disadvantage compared to Besser blocks is their durability. They don’t handle impact very wall and when used as retaining walls have to be carefully waterproofed.
Besser Block Adhesive
Yes, Besser blocks can be glued together. Construction adhesives used to glue concrete Besser blocks should be strong, durable glues that can hold blocks together.
However, if you intend to use block adhesive in a structural application like a retaining wall or the wall of a house, your structural engineers will need to specify the glue you use on the drawings.
This is because the calculations structural engineers do to determine the strength of a wall takes into account the type of glue or mortar that is used between the blocks.
Take care if substituting a structural adhesive for the mortar that in some commercial, residential and industrial walls the mortar and Besser block needs to be fire rated so the type of glue you use should also be fire rated.
Besser block Anchors
When fixing things to a Besser block wall you will need to determine if the wall is core filled or if the core you are fixing to is not filled.
You will need to use a different anchor to fix to a Besser block wall that is not core filled.
For the core filled and reinforced Besser block wall, the type o anchor you use will need to be strong enough for the type of load you are applying to the anchor and wall.
Options for anchors include chemical anchors, mechanical anchors, and screw-in anchors.
For structural applications like fixing a beam to a Besser block wall, the anchors and brackets should all be specified by an experienced structural engineer.
Clay Block Walls instead of Besser Blocks
In Australia, the structural design of clay blocks is often based on the excellent series of design and user manuals produced by the Concrete Masonry Association of Australia.
However, a first-principles design is guided by the Australian standard AS3700.
A lot of the principles of reinforcement and construction are similar to Bbesser block construction except the reinforced clay bricks do not need to be rendered and have the look of brick walls inside and out.
Don’t be confused. Reinforced clay bricks look very much like thicker single skin brick walls and this appearance has already confused a few experienced structural engineers.
Reinforced clay bricks suffer from the fact that they are only 150mm wide which makes it critical that the reinforcement is placed carefully in the middle of the blocks for maximum corrosion protection.
Besser Block Pools
Cornell Engineers has specified and supervised quite a few well-built Besser block reinforced concrete masonry pools.
The only trick is to have the pool walls and base filled with concrete in a single pour.
The only other trick is to dimension the pool base and walls appropriately so that the water and soil loads on the walls of the pool are transferred to the pool base.
There is an excellent concrete masonry pool guide located on the Shoalhaven Pools Website.
Besser block pool before being filled with concrete.
Construction Issues with Concrete Blocks
- Besser blocks are not waterproof. The external face of concrete cinder blocks needs to be waterproofed to prevent water penetration. Consult your block layer to determine your preferred waterproofing system.
- Waterproofing is especially important where concrete blocks are used as retaining walls for liveable space.
- Water coming through concrete masonry walls is often seen as efflorescence, a white crystalline salt on the surface of concrete masonry walls.
- Wall heights of more than 2500mm need to be filled in stages about 30 minutes apart to allow the grout to partially cure and become less fluid. This reduces the internal pressure of the grout on the concrete blocks.
- Standard concrete masonry wall heights in residential construction are 2500mm (2100 to the top of doors and windows and a full 2-course’ bond beam’ at the top of the wall and over openings; and 2700mm (2100mm to top of doors and windows and a full 3-course’ bond beam’ at the top of the wall and over openings.
- Blockwork control joints are 10mm wide vertical breaks in concrete masonry walls to allow differential movement of adjacent panels. Their use is optional is fully reinforced concrete masonry walls in residential walls. Their use is highly recommended in retaining walls longer than 10m.
Concrete Masonry Needs Reinforcement
- AS3700 Masonry structures.
- AS 4773 SET:2014 Masonry in small buildings
Besser Block Architecture
An exposed concrete masonry Besser block wall, especially if the concrete is polished and coloured, looks fantastic. Take special care that normally one face of the wall will be the featured face and the other side will normally be hidden. It’s just too hard to get enough face perfect Besser blocks in a batch to create a double-sided feature wall.
These exposed Besser block walls are especially suitable for architectural homes. The solid integrity of a reinforced concrete Besser block combined with the aesthetics of an exposed face is simply breathtaking.
Even though these walls are architecturally inspired, the walls are an integral component of the structure.
More about Efflorescence on Besser Blocks
When moisture comes through a Besser block wall it is often visible as efflorescence (white salty crystal) that gets drawn out of the blockwork and remains when the moisture evaporates.
At its most basic level, these salt crystals indicate that water has or is leaching through the wall. Whether this moisture is bad or not depends on the situation. Moisture leaching into a garage is not as bad as moisture leaching into a liveable space.
While the efflorescence can be removed with efflorescence remover, the source of the moisture should be investigated first and remedied if possible.
If the moisture that is causing the efflorescence is from the ground behind a retaining wall perhaps the issue is poor drainage of the soil. Maybe the efflorescence is being caused by a broken pipe behind the wall. Perhaps the drainage system behind the retaining wall has failed.
Rectification might involve improving the drainage behind the wall, reinstating the waterproofing membrane, improving surface drainage, installation of a cut off trench or waterproofing the exposed surface of the retaining wall.
Contact a structural engineer if you are concerned with efflorescence and don’t know how to solve the issue that it indicates.
How deep should a footing be for a block wall?
The footing for a block wall should be designed by a structural engineer. The design is based on a few things:
- the height and therefore the weight of the blockwork wall.
- the bearing capacity (load carrying capacity) of the foundation soil.
- the site reactivity (clayeyness) of the soil.
- the presence and depth of soft soil and loose fill.
- whether the block wall is retaining soil.
It is easy enough to find a structural engineer to design a block wall and footing for you. Contact your local structural engineering association to obtain a list of local structural engineers that can design masonry structures.
Besser block homes are extremely popular in North Queensland. They have excellent strength, durability and are easy to cyclone rate. I’m surprised they aren’t used more in the rest of Australia.
Contact Us today to get us to design your Besser Block home.
Concrete Masonry Walling Technical Manuals
Besser Block Centre
Nudgee Road Landscape Supplies
Adbri Masonry
Blockwork internal wall myths busted! | Abode New Homes
There are so many myths about block internal walls in Darwin that unsuspecting buyers seem to believe they are the best option without knowing the truth. We just want to make sure when you are investing your hard-earned cash into your future that you have all of the information before making a decision that is right for you!
Blocks used to build internal walls are only held together by the mortar between them (shear walls excluded) so there is absolutely no structural element to them, they are not filled with concrete and are not tied together, making them very susceptible to movement, in fact more than any other internal wall construction method. Below is a very good example of how movement cracks appear in blockwork homes. Once this happens, which it does often, the repair costs are huge!
Yes… it is a lot harder to put your foot through a blockwork wall but… if you hit a gyprock wall hard enough to break through it, then it is very likely that you would have moved your blockwork wall and you too will start to see cracks like these below.
The image below is from a 6yr old home in Durack in the Northern Territory where the owner contacted us for help after their ceiling fell down due to the movement of their block walls and metal roof trusses, their original builder was nowhere to be found to cover the repair costs which were in the thousands and not covered by insurance!
Myth 2 – Block work Internal walls are harder to damage!
The concrete render on block work is easily damaged in fact much easier than plasterboard. The challenge with block rendered walls is that when you try to repair a small patch you are left with unsightly marks on the wall with different textures that don’t match the rest of the wall so… repairing a small patch without it being unsightly means re-rendering the entire wall which is expensive!
Gyprock internal walls may crack or become damaged too, but they are easily fixed by any handyman and do not require any specials tools or skills. With plasterboard if you are not happy with the finish of a patch once the first coat of paint is applied then you can sand it down until you are satisfied. Unfortunately, this is not the case with concrete…once it sets it’s set regardless of if you are happy! The image below shows how the different textures make block render impossible to repair easily.
Myth 3 – No need to worry about Termites
Another myth is that if you have block work internal walls you don’t need to worry about termites but…this is definitely not the case. Termites love to eat everything from your wiring to the plasterboard in your ceiling to the kitchen cupboards so at no point in time can you afford to become complacent with your termite management plan regardless of what your home is constructed from. Our standard finish is guaranteed for 50yrs against termites if you keep your annual termite inspections up to date.
Myth 4 – Block work Internal walls keep the home cooler!
This one always fasinates me…I thought it was pretty common knowledge that concrete retains heat you only have to walk barefooted on a cool night along a concrete path to feel the temperature difference the same theory applies to your home. Once your blockwork home heats up in the wet season it’s near impossible to cool it down without a very large electricity bill from running the air conditioners at peak performance to cope. With gyprock walls once the ambient temperature drops so does the temperature of the walls and your home meaning lower cooling costs which is a bonus!
More information can be found here under the heading Hot Humid (tropical) climates.
Myth 5 – Blockwork is a superior finish!
A lot of people believe that blockwork is a superior finish and anything else is a cheap option, this makes us laugh, as again it’s a myth spread by uneducated builders…blockwork is the cheap and nasty option for internal walls that has no future benefits to help the homeowner reduce maintenance or energy costs at all. At Abode New Homes we know the most superior product on the market is a Gyprock Timber internal frame system, our frames are treated LVL timber(Laminated Veneer Lumber aka reconstituted timber) that means it’s guaranteed not to move, warp or attract termites and it’s a lot stronger and more stable than blockwork or steel frames. When I say steel frames most builders use a very flexible light weight product that is flimsy (shear walls excluded), also in our climate steel is extremely susceptible to expansion and contraction in the heat – again resulting in the unsightly cracking and movement in your home. Our timber is covered by a 50 warranty against mould, mildew and termites. We have been using this product since our inception over 15years ago and have not had any recalls from clients, in fact we have seen other builders start to follow and adapt to this product and method as well. By using timber, it allows us to provide a finish inside the home on completion that is second to none, with timber door jambs and architraves, beautiful bulkheads and not to mention our trades love working on our sites due to it’s ease of use and superior finish. The other thing to mention if you are concerned for the environment timber is the world’s most environmentally friendly building product, it’s natural, reusable, recyclable and sustainable, by choosing timber products you are helping the environment. Of course, if we have a client that has their heart set on blockwork even after doing all of their research then we will happily accommodate their needs.
Over 500 happy home owners have trusted us with their investment and we are only too happy to help you too! Feel free to give us a call on 08 8932 9999.
← New vs Old summary for first home buyers
VIRTUAL DISPLAY VILLAGE
NEW HOME DESIGNS
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
We have an awesome house thanks to awesome people and we moved in 8 weeks early!”
Alison & Scott
You can tell a good builder by the after sales service… yours has been great!”
Lee & Kathy
Our house started at the same time as our neighbour. We have had a dream run, moved in early and would build with Abode again. Our neighbour doesn’t have the same feelings for their builder.”
Sharon
pluses and minuses, feedback from residents
Block construction can be considered one of the most common ways of building residential and industrial facilities. This article will consider the pros and cons of a block house, both multi-storey and in the country, reviews of residents and builders. In addition, a comparative description of block and panel houses will be given.
What is a block house?
The building material for a block house is ready-made concrete products manufactured at reinforced concrete structures plants using a special technology. They are delivered to the construction site completely ready for use and stacked according to the project. Unlike prefabricated houses, concrete blocks are held together not by welding, but by cement mortar.
The most significant difference between block and panel houses is the wall thickness. The thickness of a standard concrete block is 400 mm, while an equal-strength panel has a thickness of 140 to 180 mm. Such a significant difference is due to the fact that the panels have steel reinforcement inside.
Another difference is the method of fastening. The slabs are connected using metal fastening plates and electric welding, unlike block structures, which are held together with ordinary cement mortar.
Advantages and disadvantages of a block apartment building
The use of blocks in the construction of apartment buildings provides many advantages.
Advantages of a block house in the city
The main advantages can be considered:
- high sound insulation . Since the thickness of the inter-apartment walls is 400 mm, extraneous sounds practically do not enter the apartment;
- great potential for redevelopment . Most projects do not have carriers inside the apartment, which allows you to implement any design solutions;
- large loggia area. Modern projects of houses provide for spacious comfortable balconies. On such a loggia, you can equip an office, a workshop or even a children’s playroom;
- high fire safety . The structures do not contain any combustible materials and fully comply with all the requirements of the fire inspection;
- environmental protection . The composition of concrete blocks includes only natural ingredients. They do not cause allergies and do not emit harmful substances into the atmosphere;
- high strength . The material is able to withstand significant mechanical loads and temperature fluctuations.
Along with the advantages listed above, block apartment buildings also have significant disadvantages.
Cons of a block multi-storey building
The disadvantages of block apartment buildings include:
- low ceilings . Most house projects provide for a ceiling height of no more than 2.5 m, which is not enough for the installation of stretch ceilings or equipment for suspended systems made of plasterboard or plastic;
- frost protection . With insufficient heating and poor ventilation of the apartment, the walls can freeze through. This can lead to the appearance of mold and fungus in the apartment;
- small apartment area . Due to the design features, the living area of apartments in such houses is small, especially for the kitchen and the corridor;
- low moisture resistance . The material intensively absorbs moisture, therefore, it needs waterproofing, a ventilated facade or other methods of protection.
In addition to multi-apartment residential buildings, concrete blocks can be used in the construction of a country or country house.
Advantages and disadvantages of a block house in the country
For the construction of country cottages, the use of blocks 400 mm wide is not advisable. During the construction of country houses, blocks are used, the overall dimensions of which are 390x190x190 mm.
Advantages
The most significant advantages of a cottage made of concrete blocks include:
- economy. With the same area of \u200b\u200bthe bearing wall, brickwork will cost twice as much;
- frost resistance. Depending on the brand of concrete, blocks can withstand from 20 to 200 cycles of freezing and thawing;
- long service life. Concrete is a strong and durable material. Buildings made of concrete blocks can last 80 years or more without major repairs;
- high construction speed . The speed of construction of buildings from concrete blocks is 15-20% higher than from bricks;
- seismic resistance . Reinforced concrete structures are able to withstand not only earthquakes, but also other natural disasters;
- easy installation. You can build a house from concrete blocks on your own, without involving specialists.
Along with the advantages listed above, a country house made of concrete blocks has a number of disadvantages.
Cons
The use of concrete blocks in suburban construction is limited by the following factors:
large mass. The standard unit weighs 17.5 kg. With such a mass of the product, independent laying is extremely difficult, especially for the upper rows;
high thermal conductivity. This disadvantage entails additional material costs associated with the thermal insulation of the building;
unattractive appearance. As a rule, a concrete block house needs additional decorative finishing in the form of plaster or a ventilated facade, which also entails additional costs.
From the above, it follows that before starting the construction of a cottage or country house, it is necessary to take into account not only the cost of the blocks themselves. The estimate can significantly increase the costs associated with thermal insulation and finishing.
Block or monolithic house: what is better
Let’s compare block and monolithic construction according to several main criteria.
- Strength properties . Monolithic walls are much more durable. This is due to the absence of seams, the presence of which significantly reduces strength.
- Operating time . The service life of a monolithic wall is longer. Here again the problem lies in the presence of seams. Even if the blocks themselves can last about 100 years, the depressurization of the seams will occur much earlier.
- Heat capacities . Block walls retain heat worse. The reason is again interblock seams, which in this case play the role of “cold bridges”.
- Price . The cost of even reinforced concrete is significantly lower than the cost of concrete blocks. In addition, work on pouring monolithic walls is cheaper than laying block materials.
- Construction pace . Laying block materials will require more time than erecting a monolithic frame or wall.
The above comparative characteristics clearly testify in favor of monolithic-frame buildings.
Feedback from tenants living in block houses
Nikolai Stepanovich, Kaluga
As soon as they bought an apartment in a new block house, they immediately started redevelopment. There were practically no load-bearing walls inside the apartment, which greatly simplified the process. Now the apartment fully meets our requirements. As for the freezing of the walls, mold and the like, nothing of the kind has been noticed so far.
Dmitry Nikolaevich, Rostov
We have a corner apartment in a block building. Last winter there were severe frosts and condensation appeared on the walls. In order to prevent the appearance of fungus and other troubles, they hastily made waterproofing and insulated the walls with foam and drywall. A little lost in the area, but now no problem.
Oleg Viktorovich, Saratov
The year before last, a small house of concrete blocks was built at the dacha. During the construction process, no serious difficulties arose, except for the heavy material. The house is solid and reliable. Outside sheathed with siding, inside pasted wallpaper. We didn’t freeze anything in winter, but there is no hint of mold and fungus. I think it will last at least 50 years.
Roman Andreevich, Moscow region
Our country house is built of concrete blocks, a ventilated corrugated facade is mounted on the outside. Even in the most severe frosts, the house is warm and comfortable, no condensation appears on the walls. The basement was waterproofed with liquid glass. Maybe a monolithic-frame house is better, but so far we have nothing to complain about.
Despite the fact that the technology of block construction is inferior to the monolithic frame method, apartments in block houses are in rather high demand. Ample opportunities for redevelopment, excellent sound insulation and a high degree of fire safety are the most significant advantages of such apartments.
What is the difference between a panel house and a block house
In the construction industry, panel and block houses are among the most popular and regularly built. What are those and others?
Contents of the article
- What is a panel house?
- What is a block house?
- Comparison
- Table
What is a panel house?
panel houses include buildings that are built, respectively, with the help of special panels – mainly reinforced concrete. They are characterized by a rather large size: the height of the walls in the houses of this type, as a rule, corresponds to the width of the building panels.
The houses in question are usually built fairly quickly and at relatively low economic cost. This circumstance largely predetermined the prevalence of panel residential buildings in the USSR and other socialist countries. At the same time, in Western countries, such houses are not uncommon.
The design of panel structures has a number of disadvantages. First of all, those panels that are most often used in the construction of the respective houses are of a size that allows for relatively low ceiling heights in the rooms. As a rule – no more than 2.5 meters.
Panel houses are usually not characterized by a high level of noise insulation, they require rather high energy costs for space heating. Many of the related structures have a simplified design, similar to most others built using similar technology. But the panels used for the construction of houses of this type can be additionally decorated with the participation of experienced designers and look very attractive as a result.
Advertisement
It is rather difficult to carry out redevelopment in panel houses. This is due to the fact that the panels involved in the design are monolithic, they cannot be disassembled. The only actual option is to break them with a puncher, which is very laborious and noisy.
But it is worth noting that modern panel houses, thanks to the development of building technologies, can be deprived of these shortcomings. The panels that are used in their construction can be ordered in any desired quantity and at an affordable price in the optimal size – in order to ensure sufficient ceiling height.
Panel bonding technologies in modern homes provide a good level of heat and sound insulation. This is also facilitated by more technologically advanced materials used to produce panels. Some modifications of the relevant materials are much easier to perforate than, for example, reinforced concrete, in case the apartment needs to be redevelopment.
back to contents ↑
What is a block house?
Houses of this type are built, respectively, from blocks, which are most often made, as in the case of panels, from reinforced concrete. But, as a rule, their value is relatively small: quite rarely the height of the walls in the houses in question corresponds to the width of one block (as is possible when using panels for the construction of houses of the first type). Reinforced concrete in block houses can be supplemented with other components – such as, for example, expanded clay.
Due to the noted design feature of block houses (when the height of the walls corresponds to the width of several blocks), it is much easier to redevelop them technically – but in fact it is undesirable, since when changing the structure of the walls in the buildings under consideration, there is a risk of eliminating the support of the ceiling slab, due to what it can collapse.
Block houses were also widespread in the USSR – due to the standardization and relative simplicity of the production of blocks involved in the construction of such structures. Block projects to some extent competed with those that involved the construction of housing for citizens using panels.
In the modern construction industry, the construction of houses of this type is also quite common. For block structures built using traditional technologies, the same disadvantages are characteristic as for panel houses: a rather low level of sound insulation, relatively high heating costs. But with the use of modern materials, they can be largely eliminated.
to contents ↑
Comparison
The main difference between a panel house and a block house is the use of those panels during the construction of the first, the width of which in most cases corresponds to the height of the ceilings in the rooms. The blocks involved in the construction of houses of the second type are usually several times less than the designed ceiling height. In other aspects (the material for the manufacture of the main building elements, indicators of heat and sound insulation, the possibility of redevelopment) of the type of structure under consideration are very similar.
Having studied the difference between a panel house and a block house, we will reflect the conclusions in the table.
back to contents
Block house – all the features of 9002 houses of enlarged blocks appeared in the 50s of the last century as a solution to increase the pace of housing construction.
At first they tried to use blocks assembled from bricks at the factory, but later only concrete ones were used.
Series of block houses
All residential block houses in the metropolitan area were built according to standard projects in the period from 1954 to 1967.
Series II-04 and II-05 were the first, on which the technology was worked out and the cost of construction of block buildings was estimated. There are not so many of these houses, but some of them are built with 6 – 8 floors and are equipped with an elevator.
Block house series II-04
Block 8-9-storey one-access towers of series II-18 are most widely used in Moscow. More than 850 of them were built in Moscow, and they became the first mass-produced Khrushchevs to receive an elevator and a garbage chute.
Houses of series II-18
Block houses of the All-Union series 1-439 and 1-467 were built in the Moscow region and in a small number in Moscow. These series, in addition to the five-story ones, also had nine-story modifications with an elevator.
1-439 and 1-467 Series Houses
Block House Construction
As building pieces, blocks are large, shaped bricks that form the load-bearing walls of a building. Floor panels and partitions rest on block walls.
In appearance, it is quite easy to distinguish a panel house from a block house (unless, of course, the facade has additional finishing).
Unlike block houses, panel houses are assembled from larger parts, which reduces the number of seams between individual elements, but complicates installation.
The construction of block houses did not require welding – the blocks were fastened with a cement-sand mixture.
An example of the construction of a block house
Even in comparison with large block buildings, panel houses are assembled from much larger parts.
Another feature of the design of block buildings can be considered the thickness of the bearing walls, which is rarely less than 38 cm and more than 46 cm.
Block house – pros and cons
Apartments in block houses do not have such an abundance of load-bearing walls as panel ones.
Most apartments in block houses are not partitioned off by load-bearing walls, which simplifies their redevelopment. At the same time, many layouts in block houses provide for walk-through rooms.
Block walls provide good thermal performance and sound insulation, but much depends on the quality of block joints, which are many in buildings of this design.
Over time, seams may lose their seal and require maintenance. Panel houses have inherited the same problem, but to a lesser extent.
In some cases, the reason for the destruction of interpanel joints in the first block series was the uneven settlement of the foundation.
Another disadvantage of block buildings can be considered rather low ceilings, rarely exceeding 250 cm.
Development of the idea of block houses
hinged (non-bearing) panels made of expanded clay concrete or three-layer panels with insulation.
The widespread series II-68, I-209A, I-522A, I-700, as well as their modifications, have this design. Less common are houses of the I-491A series, as well as I-580.
Some series have reached 22 floors.
Examples of panel-block buildings
Panel-block houses grew up to 16 floors, but a further increase in the number of storeys with block load-bearing walls turned out to be impractical.
The age of block-panel series turned out to be long – their construction was completed only in 1993 year.
Block houses compared to others
Progress in mass construction has left block houses behind – along with an increase in the number of storeys, the task was to speed up installation, which gave advantage to prefabricated housing construction.
Brick and monolithic buildings, more expensive in terms of cost, did not become as popular as block buildings, and then panel ones. Most often, in comparison, the features of apartments in panel and block buildings are considered.
It must be admitted that panel houses improved with each new project – the ceilings in some of them grew to 290 cm, and the areas of the rooms have increased significantly.
However, the construction of panel houses requires more load-bearing walls, which greatly complicates the redevelopment.
During the rehabilitation (overhaul) of block houses in Moscow (early series), the problems associated with their design flaws and deterioration of communications are solved.
Facades receive additional thermal insulation and a neat appearance. Balconies are glazed, windows with energy-saving double-glazed windows are installed.
Block houses after renovation
Remodeling of an apartment in a block house
For the most massive series, block houses, developed by the design institute MNIITEP, their author prepared a catalog of typical redevelopments.
The use of MNIITEP catalog options when remodeling an apartment significantly reduces costs and time for repair approval.
Typical redevelopment in a block house
You can get a free consultation on the redevelopment of an apartment in a block house from the employees of our organization. This will allow at the very initial stage to take into account your wishes and take into account the requirements of current regulations.
We will be able to prepare all the documentation necessary for coordinating the work, as well as take over the execution of redevelopment in all state authorities.
Block house. Design and construction features.
Since the middle of the last century, the construction of multi-storey residential buildings in the country has been carried out using industrial methods.
The basic principle of industrial prefabricated housing is to divide the construction process into two stages:
- prefabrication of house elements in a factory way;
- erection of buildings from precast concrete structures and prefabricated parts at construction sites.
Type of house – block: what does it mean?
A block house is a residential building built from ready-made concrete products – blocks and reinforced concrete floor slabs. Such blocks are produced at specialized enterprises. Then the finished products are brought to the construction site and, according to the project, a house is assembled from them.
Concrete block residential building technology was designed to reduce the time and cost of housing construction. And at the initial stage, volume-block construction made it possible to reduce the cost of building houses and increase the pace of housing construction.
Thus, the cost of a block multi-storey building and the labor intensity of its construction were noticeably lower than a brick residential building. It is also worth noting the simplicity of the shape of the blocks, the relative simplicity of their manufacture and installation at any time of the year.
Block construction of multi-storey houses has its own design features:
- Block houses are assembled from expanded clay concrete or cinder block elements.
- Ceilings are made of hollow-core reinforced concrete slabs.
- Ceiling heights are typically 2.65 m or less.
- Internal partitions can be either block or gypsum concrete.
- Sanitary cabins in such houses, as in most panel houses, were made as a separate structure at a house-building plant and mounted by a crane in the right place.
Block houses in Moscow
The construction of block houses began in the 50s of the last century and was completed in the late 90s. The first two large-block houses were built in Moscow on 5th Sovetskaya Street and on Bolshaya Polyanka according to the designs of engineers G.B. Krasin and E.V. Kostyrko.
The most common series of block houses are 1-510, II-18, I209A and II-68. There are many other series, such as I-491A, I-700A, I-522A, etc. Also in Moscow, there are late Stalinist large-block houses of series II-04, II-05, etc. Projects of block houses of the most popular series in Moscow have been developed Institute MNIITEP.
Block house – pros and cons
Block apartment buildings are good because thick inter-apartment walls prevent unwanted outside noise from penetrating into the premises.
In addition, the interior walls of block residential buildings are usually non-bearing, which opens up more opportunities for redevelopment. On the features of the redevelopment of an apartment in a block house, we will describe further.
Now a few words about why a block house is bad. The disadvantage of a block house is the small area of \u200b\u200bthe apartments. This disadvantage applies primarily to block five-story buildings of the 1-510 series, in which there are also very small kitchens.
In addition, in block buildings built in the 60-70s, the quality of the seams between the floor slabs (series I209A) and not always convenient apartment layouts.
What is the difference between a block house and a panel house?
In a typical panel house, the reinforced concrete slab determines the height of the floor and the size of the wall of the room, and the width of the floor slab is usually proportional to the width of the room. In block houses, the wall of one room is assembled from several elements.
External and internal walls in block houses are thicker than in panel houses. In addition, in these buildings, the installation of building structures is carried out in different ways: the panels are fastened with the help of welded reinforcing embedded parts, and the blocks are connected to each other with a cement-sand mortar.
A panel residential building is built faster than a block multi-storey building. In many ways, this factor has become a determining factor in the choice of industrial methods of housing construction in favor of the development of panel housing construction. While the mass volumetric-block housing construction was actually terminated over time. And at present, block technology is not used in the construction of apartment buildings.
Block or panel house – which is better?
We found out the differences in the construction of block and panel houses. Now let’s determine from the point of view of living which house is better – block or panel:
- In panel houses, especially modern series, more spacious apartments and higher ceilings. Residential and auxiliary premises of panel apartments also have a larger area than block apartments.
- Block houses have less successful layouts of apartments compared to panel residential buildings.
- Most of the walls inside an apartment in panel houses are load-bearing structures. Because of this, there are much fewer options for any significant reorganization of apartments in “panels” compared to block houses, where, as we have already noted, the internal walls are mostly non-bearing.
Re-planning in a block house
Repair and re-planning of an apartment in a block house, as well as in panel-type houses, is a very common occurrence. And this is not surprising, because in the era of mass housing construction, a lot of panel and block residential buildings were erected. The relative cheapness of construction and the speed of erecting a block house predetermined their wide distribution at the time of mass development.
However, the quality of construction at that time was not the highest, and the layouts of apartments in block houses were cramped and inconvenient, so it is natural that many of their owners today want to improve their living conditions.
Despite the fact that, due to the nature of the construction, the number of load-bearing walls in block houses is much less than in panel houses, and this simplifies the coordination of certain types of redevelopment, those walls that are included in the load-bearing scheme of a block house are twice as thick as load-bearing walls made of reinforced concrete panels. This moment complicates the arrangement of openings in them, since more powerful reinforcement with metal structures is required. Let’s take an illustrative example.
Strengthening the opening in a block house, photo.
Strengthening the opening in a panel house, photo.
Coordination of the redevelopment of an apartment in a block house is practically no different from a similar process in other types of apartment buildings – brick, panel and monolithic.
It is possible to agree on redevelopment in a block house according to a standard project, which can be found in the corresponding catalog. The author of this catalog is the MNIITEP Institute, which at one time developed most of the series of block houses.
If you are planning “modest” actions: moving a toilet bowl, bathtub or other engineering devices within the premises in which they were previously located, then you can get by with a notification procedure for agreeing on redevelopment.
When the goals of redevelopment are the dismantling of a non-load-bearing partition or an opening in it, the expansion of a bathroom at the expense of a non-residential premises or its combination with a bathroom, or other actions that a priori do not affect the supporting structures of the house, project documentation as part of a technical report and a redevelopment project is possible order in any design organization with SRO approval, including ours.
Our organization is engaged in the development of project documentation and the coordination of redevelopment in Moscow and the Moscow region.
If it is planned to affect load-bearing walls, ceilings, then such redevelopment requires the development of a technical report from the author of the house project. At the same time, any organization with the approval of the SRO can develop a redevelopment project.
That is why many owners are wondering: is it not easier to carry out redevelopment without permission, especially since many options for redevelopment of apartments in block houses are freely available on the Internet?
Unfortunately, unauthorized work can lead to an accident later. For example, if you have partially or completely demolished a load-bearing wall, then the appearance of cracks in you and your neighbors is only a matter of time. In our practice, there were appeals from citizens through whose fault emergency situations arose.
It will not be possible to legitimize the redevelopment of an apartment, carried out with serious violations. You will have to pay a fine, and the apartment will have to be returned to its previous state, in accordance with the original BTI floor plan, as directed by the Moscow Housing Inspectorate. In addition, if your work has caused damage to your neighbors, you will have to pay for it at your own expense.
It is possible to avoid many unpleasant consequences associated with unauthorized redevelopment of an apartment in a block house only if all work is agreed on time, that is, before they begin. But the approval process can be long, especially for redevelopments that affect load-bearing walls and require the development of project documentation. And if you do not have enough time for this, then it is best to turn to the services of specialists for coordination.
In order for the organization you have chosen to be able to start working, you will need to issue a notarized power of attorney to agree on the redevelopment of the apartment. After that, it’s not you who will have to deal with all the hassle of coordination, but the employees of the company you have chosen. You can read about how to choose a company for coordinating redevelopment in the article at the link.
The photo shows an approved project for the redevelopment of a two-room apartment in a block house of the I209A series with a combined bathroom, developed by our organization.
To get a free consultation on the redevelopment of an apartment in a block house, please contact our specialists. Here you will find all the ways to contact us.
Block house | it’s… What is a block house?
Industrial housing construction – construction of microdistricts from standard block houses. (Map of the 2nd microdistrict of Tomsk)
Houses of mass series were built in the cities of the USSR and in some countries of the Warsaw Pact, and are the basis of the architectural appearance of many residential areas of these cities.
Due to political, ideological and demographic reasons, the period of Khrushchev’s “thaw” was the first in the history of the Soviet planned economy, when, along with the development of heavy industry, a significant increase in the production of consumer goods and everything, one way or another related to the needs of the people, and not the military industrial complex and resource-consuming raw industries.
The thrown slogan “Catch up and overtake America (in production …)” indirectly testified to the Soviet leadership’s recognition of the lagging behind the level of economic development from Western countries (although in official propaganda they continued to be considered a “decaying” and doomed economic formation). The lag concerned the quality of food (per capita consumption of the most important products, primarily meat), housing conditions (especially in comparison with the United States), the ability to purchase certain durable goods (household appliances, etc.), transport mobility (the level of motorization, the development of railway and air transportation), etc.
The Khrushchev years are best known for the state’s attempts to solve the housing problem through the development of industrial housing construction – the construction of microdistricts from 5- and 9-storey standard block houses. The reduction in the cost of construction, on the one hand, made it possible to increase the commissioning of housing, on the other hand, it did not make it much more comfortable than communal apartments.
Contents
|
History
block buildings built in Berlin and Dresden
Moscow. Losinoostrovsky district. Graffiti on one of the houses.
In the USSR, the harbingers of the coming mass construction on the basis of industrial blocks and panels were cinder-block “stalinkas”. Cinder block “Stalins” often have a dull look. The architecture is utilitarian, there are no decorations, unplastered sand-lime bricks for exterior walls, almost flat facades with standard stucco decoration. The first four-story frame-panel house in the USSR was built in 1948 in Moscow on the 5th st. Falcon Mountain (G. Kuznetsov, B. Smirnov). At this time, the country’s leadership set the builders the task of creating the cheapest possible project for a residential building with the possibility of family settlement (that is, with separate, and not communal, apartments). The first step in this task was the introduction of the idea of industrial panel housing construction with a load-bearing frame. In 1948-1951, M. V. Posokhin, A. A. Mndoyants and V. P. Lagutenko built up a quarter in Moscow (Kuusinen and Sorge streets) with 10-story frame-panel houses. In the same year, a project for a frameless panel house was developed (under construction since 1950 g in Magnitogorsk). In 1954 in Moscow on the 6th st. Oktyabrsky field, a 7-storey frameless panel house was built (G. Kuznetsov, B. Smirnov, L. Wrangel, Z. Nesterova, N. A. Osterman). Khrushchev buildings, which were designed since the late 1940s, went into series after the historic 1955 decree “On the Elimination of Excesses in Design and Construction” (“the outwardly ostentatious side of architecture, replete with great excesses”, characteristic of the Stalin era, now “does not correspond to the line of the Party and the Government in the architectural and construction business . .. Soviet architecture should be characterized by simplicity, rigor of forms and cost-effectiveness of solutions”).
The ideological and scientific substantiation of the new course was reduced to the following points:
- the communal apartment was not a project of the Soviet government, but was the result of cost savings during industrialization;
- Living in one apartment by several families is not normal and is a social problem; [1]
- communal apartments – an economically disadvantageous type of housing that does not meet modern requirements;
- The problem of communal apartments can be solved through mass construction using new technologies.
The turning point was the resolutions “On measures for further industrialization, improving the quality and reducing the cost of construction” 1956 [2] and “On the development of housing construction in the USSR” 1957 [3] . The task of the party to the builders was to develop by the autumn of 1956 projects that would dramatically reduce the cost of building housing and make it affordable for the working people. So the famous “Khrushchev” appeared. The goal of the project was that in 1980 each Soviet family would meet communism in a separate apartment. [2]
However, by the mid-1980s, only 85% of families had separate apartments: in 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev pushed back the deadlines by 15 years, putting forward the slogan “Every Soviet family – a separate apartment by the year 2000.” [2] [4]
In 1959, the 21st Congress noted the existence of the housing problem and called the development of housing construction “one of the most important tasks.” It was envisaged that in 1959-1965. 2.3 times more apartments will be commissioned than in the last seven years. Moreover, the emphasis was on individual, rather than communal apartments. [5] [6]
The prototype for the first “Khrushchev” were block buildings (Plattenbau), built in Berlin and Dresden since the 1920s. The construction of residential buildings “Khrushchev” lasted from 1959 to 1985. In 1956-1965, more than 13 thousand residential buildings were built in the USSR, and almost all of them were five-story buildings. This made it possible to commission 110 million square meters of housing annually. An appropriate production base and infrastructure was created: house-building plants, reinforced concrete factories, etc. The first house-building plants were created in 1959 in the system of Glavleningradstroy, in 1962 organized in Moscow and other cities. In particular, during the period 1966-1970, 942,000 people in Leningrad received living space, with 809,000 moving into new houses and 133,000 getting space in old houses. Since 1960, residential 9-storey panel houses have been under construction, since 1963 – 12-storey ones.
Technology
Components of a panel house, which are large reinforced concrete slabs, are manufactured in factories. In terms of quality, any products manufactured in the factory according to existing GOSTs, and with proper technical control, will always differ in a positive direction from products manufactured directly at the construction site. The construction of a panel house resembles the assembly of a children’s design kit. Ready-made parts of the structure are delivered to the construction site, which the builders only have to mount. As a result, labor productivity in such a building is very high. The area of the construction site is much less than that required for the construction of a brick house. Such lengthy and labor-intensive processes, such as installing reinforcement or concreting, which are typical for monolithic housing construction, are completely excluded. And it is precisely in this that experts see the main advantage of panel housing construction over other types of construction.
Typical house series
1940s
Since 1947, the USSR Academy of Architecture has been developing a prefabricated large-panel dwelling. Frame-panel and frameless houses are under construction:
- 4-5-storey buildings (Moscow, Leningrad, Magnitogorsk)
- 8-storey with panels on two floors (Moscow)
Brick Khrushchev series 1-447 in Tomsk
1950s
The height of 5 floors was chosen because, according to the then norms, it was the highest number of floors at which it was allowed to build houses without an elevator (however, sometimes houses were built with 6 floors – with a store on the ground floor).
Brick Khrushchev with a store on the ground floor in St. Petersburg
Since 1957, the construction of panel houses began – the so-called “Khrushchev”. Starting from the 1990s, they began to be called “Khrushchev” for a number of certain inconveniences: low noise insulation and insufficient thermal insulation – coolness in winter and, conversely, unbearable heat in summer (especially on upper floors)
1960s
Kashtak
Panel Khrushchev series 1-515/5 in Tomsk
- 1-510 Block five-storey house.
- 1-511 Five-storey brick house.
- K-7 Five-storey panel house. They have been demolished in Moscow since the late 1990s. The panels from which these houses were built, in most cases, were lined with white square tiles with a side of about 5 cm. Houses of this and similar types were popularly called: “Khrushchev”. Another feature is the protruding frame elements at the corners of the rooms. Basically, the houses of this series were built with 1, 2 and 3-room apartments, three apartments per floor. In the 1st microdistrict of Zelenograd there are also houses of this series with 4-room apartments (building 101-103). Ceiling height – 2.48 m (according to other sources 2.59m). Vertical pitch – approximately 2.85 m. Horizontal pitch – 3.20 m. Internal concrete panels 270 mm thick. Partitions – gypsum concrete panels 80 mm thick. Ceilings – reinforced concrete panels 220 mm thick.
- II-32 – a series of panel five-story multi-section residential buildings, one of the first series of industrial housing construction, the basis of some areas of mass residential development in the 60s. Demolished in Moscow since the end of 1990s.
- II-29 Brick 9-storey house. In Moscow, one house of this series stands inside the Boulevard Ring (Kolpachny lane, building 6, building 5)
- 1-335 Panel 5-storey residential building. The most common series of panel 5-storey residential buildings throughout the former USSR. The houses of this series were built from 1958 to 1966, after which they switched to the construction of the modernized series 1-335a and 1-335d, which were produced until 1976 inclusive.
- 1-464 Panel 5-storey residential building (Belarus).
- BM-4 A series of residential buildings for district centers and small towns (Belarus).
1970s
Chertanovo. Aerial view
Houses in Ziepniekkalns: serial block buildings 602 and 119 series
In 1970, the Unified catalog of building parts was adopted, on the basis of which standard projects were further developed.
house series P-46 in Zelenograd. Floors: 14
- house series (5-9 storey houses)
- 1-515/9m
- 1-515/9sh
- 1605/9
house series II-18/12. Number of floors: 12 Height of residential premises: 2.64 m m.
- II-18/9 – a series of block 9- (originally 😎 storey one-section (single-access) residential buildings, one of the first series of high-rise buildings of industrial housing construction.
- II-29
- II-32
- II-49
- 1LG-600 (Avtovsky DSK) – the so-called “home-ships”
- 111-90 – a series of large-panel multi-section residential buildings for industrial housing construction. The series was developed by TsNIIEP Dwellings in the late 1960s. Industrial production of buildings of the 111-90 series began in the early 1970s. Initially, the houses were five- and nine-story, but in the suburbs of Veliky Novgorod you can find houses three stories high (for example, in Grigorovo).
- 111-108 A series of 9-storey panel houses (Vitebsk).
1980s
- P-44
In the early 1980s, a series of KOPEs (composite space-planning elements) was proposed in Moscow, designed to build “buffer zones” between new buildings and protected areas of architectural monuments and areas of mass development, as well as to “revitalize” existing areas. The first houses of this series were erected in 1982 near Vorontsovsky Park. The project provided for the possibility of building houses up to 22 floors. At the same time, in many districts of Moscow and other cities of the USSR, faceless, multi-storey panel monsters, devoid of any expressiveness in architecture, continued to be built.
1990s
Ruins of the demolished Khrushchev building in Moscow
The territories of demolished 5-storey panel houses are built up with 17-25-storey residential buildings, mainly new series of panel houses.
2000s
Heating point (CHP) and attached building, Moscow
Typical nine-story buildings of the 1960s on Krasnokholmskaya embankment, reconstructed in the early 2000s
Novokosino District Center
- P-44T
- P-44TM
- P55M
- P111M
- PD-4
- HMS-1
- I-155
- I-1723
- KOPE
- P3M
The height of residential premises is 2.64 m. The series consists of houses from layout (catalog) space-planning elements (abbreviated as “KOPE”), representing a vertical block in the height of the house and part of the section in plan. The combined “KOPE” form residential complexes of various architecture.
- KOPE-M-PARUS
- Individual project monolith-brick
- IP-46S
Apartment types and characteristics
There are several classifications of apartments. Common abbreviations and their interpretation:
- xp (Khrushchev layout, aka Khrushchev) – ceilings 2.5 m, small kitchens – 6 sq.m., combined bathroom, adjoining rooms, apartments are located in 5-storey buildings.
- Unitary enterprise (improved layout) – a little better than Khrushchev, kitchen 6-8 sq.m., separate bathroom, walk-through rooms.
- PG (full size)
- el (elite)
- Pg – Full-sized apartments are houses built before the Khrushchev housing reform. They have high ceilings up to 3.5 m, large comfortable kitchens up to 15 sq.m., total area of apartments: from 110 sq.m. three-room apartments up to 40 sq.m. one-room. The rooms in these apartments are isolated, bathrooms are separate, large landings. Houses of 3, 5 floors, as a rule, brick.
- Xp – Khrushchevkas are residential 4, 5-storey buildings built during the Khrushchev housing program, when in the post-war period the country needed mass and inexpensive housing construction. Therefore, apartments of a small area were built, rather compact, as a rule, adjacent rooms with low ceilings, with a total area of 60 sq.m. three-room apartments, 43 sq.m. two-room and 30 sq.m. one-room apartments, with small kitchens (5-6 sq.m.), combined bathrooms and balconies, not in all apartments.
panel house
- Typ. or Art. – Typical or Standard layout of apartments – these are apartments of the next (after Khrushchev’s time) generation: ceiling height from 2.6 m to 2.75 m, total area of apartments from 63 sq.m. three-room apartments up to 33 sq.m. one-room apartments, kitchens 6-7 sq.m., rooms in two-room apartments are isolated, in three-room apartments they are adjoining-isolated, bathrooms are usually isolated, there are balconies and loggias. These are houses of 5, 9 floors with a garbage chute and elevators. Most of these houses are built of reinforced concrete panels.
- U/P – Improved planning apartments are usually 9-storey panel houses with an increased area of apartments: 69 sq. m. three-room apartments, 53 sq.m. two-room and 39 sq.m. one-room apartments, the kitchen area has also been increased to 9 sq.m., all rooms are isolated, bathrooms are separate, there are balconies and loggias. The houses are equipped with elevators and garbage chutes.
- Email – Elite apartments or apartments of the new generation have no restrictions on the area, are diverse in their layout. Most often, the future owner plans his own housing. They are equipped with a large number of services – these are underground garages, a garbage chute, both passenger and cargo elevators, storerooms and a vegetable store, large landings, convenient access roads, gyms, saunas, etc. are possible.
Elements of panel buildings
One typical thorn in the eye of old Soviet buildings is the homemade glazed balconies
- Foundation;
- Wall;
- Column;
- Jumper;
- Cover;
- Rigel;
- Beam;
- Coating;
- Roof;
- Roofing;
- Staircase;
- Step;
- Partition;
- Door;
- Window;
- Engineering systems.
Other countries
-
Main article : Social housing
House of architect Le Corbusier In Berlin. after the Second World War was considered a standard.
Houses in Hammarkullen – Gothenburg suburb
View of Brasilia and from the TV tower
For the 1922 Salon d’Automne, Édouard Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret presented the project “Modern City of 3 Million Inhabitants”, which proposed a new vision of the city of the future. Subsequently, this project was transformed into the “Plan Voisin” (1925) is a developed proposal for a radical reconstruction of Paris. The Voisin plan provided for the construction of a new business center of Paris on a completely cleared area. To do this, it was proposed to demolish 240 hectares of old buildings. Eighteen identical skyscraper-offices of 50 floors, according to the plan, were located freely, at a sufficient distance from each other. At the same time, the built-up area was only 5%, and the remaining 95% of the territory was allocated for highways, parks and pedestrian zones. The “Plan Voisin” was widely discussed in the French press and became something of a sensation.
In 1924, by order of the industrialist Henri Fruget, in the village of Pessac near Bordeaux, the town “Modern Houses of Fruget” ( Quartiers Modernes Frugès ) was erected according to the project of Corbusier. This town, consisting of 50 two-three-story residential buildings, was one of the first experiments in the construction of houses in series (in France). Four types of buildings are used here, different in configuration and layout – tape houses, block houses and detached houses. In this project, Corbusier tried to find the formula for a modern home at affordable prices – simple forms, easy to build and at the same time with a modern level of comfort.
At the 1925 International Exhibition of Modern Decorative and Industrial Arts in Paris, the Esprit Nouveau pavilion ( L’Esprit Nouveau ) was built according to the design of Corbusier. The pavilion included a full-size residential cell of an apartment building – an experimental apartment on two levels. Corbusier used a similar cell later, in the late 40s, when creating his Marseille Residential Unit . Block Marseille (1947-1952) is an apartment building in Marseille, located alone on a spacious green area. Corbusier used in this project standardized “duplex” apartments (on two levels) with balconies overlooking both sides of the house. Inside the building – in the middle of its height – there is a public service complex: a cafeteria, a library, a post office, grocery stores and more. For the first time on such a scale, the enclosing walls of the loggias were painted in bright pure colors – polychromy. Similar Residential Units (partially modified) were erected later in the cities of Nantes-Rezé (1955), Mo (1960), Brie-en-Foret (1961), Firmini (1968) (France), in West Berlin (1957). These buildings embodied the idea of Corbusier’s “Radiant City” – a city favorable for human existence. In 1950, at the invitation of the Indian authorities of the state of Punjab, Corbusier embarked on the most ambitious project of his life – the project of the new capital of the state, the city of Chandigarh. As in the Marseille block, a special concrete surface treatment technology, the so-called “béton brut” (fr. – raw concrete), was used for the exterior. This technique, which became a feature of Le Corbusier’s style, was later picked up by many architects in Europe and countries in other regions, which made it possible to speak of the emergence of a new trend of “brutalism”. Brutalism was most widespread in Great Britain (especially in 1960s) and in the USSR (especially in the 1980s) by the beginning of the 1980s. Western Europe was swept by a wave of protests against this kind of development. Over time, brutalism began to be perceived as the embodiment of the worst qualities of modern architecture (alienation from human needs, soullessness, claustrophobia, etc.), and its demand faded. The planned city of Brasilia, the capital of Brazil, was created as the embodiment of Le Corbusier’s vision, and includes some of the world-famous examples of typical residential buildings designed by him in the 1920s and 1940s.
Terminology
“plattenbau” (“panel building”)]
Poland
- Russia: “panel house” , “block house” or simply “block”
- CZ: Panelák (block houses in the former Czechoslovakia at Wikimedia Commons)
The term panelák is used specifically for block houses built in the former Czechoslovakia. Nevertheless, similar houses were built in other socialist countries, and even in Western Europe. Panelak (Czech term “panelák”) equivalents in other languages:
- French: Maison à panneaux
- German: Plattenbau / “plattenbau” (“panel building”)]
- Austria: Gemeindebau
- Bulgarian: panel block , panel block
- Croatian: stambeni blok (“tiled block”)
- Slovak: Panelový dom (“panel house”)
- Polish: Blok , Wielka płyta (“wielka (great/large) pŞyta”) (block houses in Poland at Wikimedia Commons)
- Romanian: Bloc
- Italian: Casa prefabbricata
- Estonian: Paneelmaja
- Hungarian: panelház (“panel house”) or tömbház (“block house”), Transylvanian variant;
- Finnish: Elementtitalo , Tornitalo
- Serbian: stambeni blok (“stambeni (tiled) block”)
- Catalan: bloc prefabricat
Prague, Czech Republic
- Spanish: Torreta prefabricada (usually Panel or Sectional in the US)
- Esperanto: Slabokonstruaĵo
- Slovenian: sk:Vežový dom
One-section (one-entrance) residential building in Bratislava
Changwang Street (Pyongyang).
In Poland, it is customary to paint block houses in bright colors
See also
Insula
During the Soviet years, typical architecture was widely used throughout the country. The areas of new buildings in different cities were similar to each other. The irony and curiosity of such a situation is played up, for example, in the film The Irony of Fate, or Enjoy Your Bath!
English
- Public housing
- Apartment building
- Systematization (Romania)
- Urban decay
- en:Category:Urban studies and planning0028
- Category:Planned_cities
Notes
- ↑ although for many people a room in communal apartments in the first years of Soviet power was an improvement in living conditions, allowing them to move out of corners and basements;
- ↑ 1 2 3 The implementation of the mortgage lending program for workers of the Russian Railways and the prospects for the participation of Russian Railways and it. Abstracts of the speech by E. V. Sukhorukova, Executive Director of the NPF “Prosperity”: As many people know, in Soviet Russia, the authorities for the first time thought about providing citizens with housing after the war. In 1955, on August 23, a resolution of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR “On measures for further industrialization, improving the quality and reducing the cost of construction” was issued. Party directives prescribed: by September 1956, to develop standard projects that would dramatically reduce the cost of housing construction and make it affordable for workers. The goal of the project was such that in 1980 every Soviet family would “meet communism” in a separate apartment. Neither communism, nor the availability of an apartment for each family, unfortunately, did not happen. True, let’s pay tribute: there are now much more “Khrushchev” houses in Russia than houses of pre-revolutionary construction, and, in general, at one time they really helped to partially solve the housing problem.
- ↑ CPSU in revolutions and decisions of congresses, conferences and plenums of the Central Committee M.: Politizdat, 1989. Volume 9 Edition 9. Decree of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR “On the development of housing construction in the USSR”. 31 July 1957: In the country of socialism, where power belongs to the working people, raising the standard of living and well-being of the people is one of the most important tasks. For the Communist Party and the Soviet government there is no higher goal than concern for the welfare and happiness of the people, for the improvement of their living conditions.
- ↑ Housing not available to everyone. // Parliamentary Gazette, 21 June 2007
- ↑ CPSU in resolutions and decisions of congresses, conferences and plenums of the Central Committee. M.: Politizdat, 1981. v.9, p. 391. Resolution of the 21st Congress of the CPSU “On the target figures for the development of the national economy of the USSR for 1959-1965”: The Communist Party and the Soviet government believe that at present the further development of housing construction which is of national importance, is one of the most important tasks of all Party, Soviet, trade union, and economic bodies, of the entire Soviet people. The fulfillment of the tasks set in the decision of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers on the development of housing construction in the USSR is being successfully carried out and will be ensured in time, in order to eliminate the shortage of housing in the country. For these purposes, it is planned to build in 1959-1965 in cities and workers’ settlements, settlements of state farms, RTS and timber industry enterprises at the expense of state capital investments and funds from the population with the help of state loans, residential buildings with a total area of 650-660 million square meters. m, or about 15 million apartments, which is 2.3 times more than built in the previous seven years. About 7,000,000 dwelling houses will be built in the countryside by the collective farmers and the rural intelligentsia. The housing stock in cities and workers’ settlements will increase 1.6 times by the end of the seven-year period. In cities and rural areas, economical, well-appointed apartments for one family will be built. The task is to make a transition in the distribution of living space to the provision of a separate apartment for a family.
- ↑ CPSU in resolutions and decisions of congresses, conferences and plenums of the Central Committee. Moscow: Politizdat, 1981, v.9, p. 392 personal savings. At the same time, it is planned to improve the quality of prefabricated prefabricated houses sold to the population, as well as to assist developers in their assembly. Measures will be taken to broadly develop housing construction cooperation in order to attract the personal savings of the working people to the development of housing construction.
Links
- lenin’s hill aparment view VIDEO
- Housing Strategy. Series of houses»
- “type series of high-rise buildings”
- Descriptions and layouts of standard projects
- Typical layouts of apartments
- zdanija.ru typical series of houses RF
- types and series of houses
pros and cons in 2022? Which is better?
Modern construction has reached such a high level that the housing being built is of extremely high quality.
There are several types of buildings: panel, monolithic or block house. Many do not see the differences between these buildings, but in vain, because when buying this is extremely important.
Features of the construction of block buildings
Modern masterpieces of block building attract many potential homebuyers. The first block houses with 5 floors began to be built back in the 50-60s. last century. Later, the number of storeys of such buildings increased. Today, block residential buildings already reach 16 floors.
Finished blocks are laid, fastened with cement mixtures. There are two types of block production: foam and gas blocks. The concrete solution foams, as a result, the blocks are light, with a high level of sound absorption and heat retention.
With such construction, there is no main disadvantage of panel buildings – poor sealing of joints . Such structures are resistant to soil subsidence and seismic vibrations. Any building material has its pros and cons, and block structures are no exception.
Advantages of prefabricated residential buildings
Prefabricated prefabricated buildings are quick to assemble, ready in a few months. Such objects speed up the construction, guaranteeing equity investors faster receipt of the keys to their brand new apartment.
The main advantages of such housing experts include:
- Excellent sound insulation. The design is able to absorb external sounds, which makes living in such an apartment more comfortable. Numerous reviews of residents confirm this fact.
- Fire resistance in such houses is also quite high.
- Block houses are characterized as frost-resistant buildings. Experts note that such structures are much less cold than panel ones.
- Simplicity of finishing works. Plaster, any kind of paint or wallpaper and other finishing materials easily fit on block walls.
- Block building material is ideal for the construction of country houses. Such buildings are built in the shortest possible time.
- Aerated concrete block material is highly durable. They are comparable in strength to stone, do not rot, and over time do not lose heat and sound insulation qualities.
- Relative availability. Compared to brick or wooden beams, building a house from aerated concrete will be much cheaper.
Building from blocks is considered relatively inexpensive, while in most Russian regions building materials show high environmental friendliness, fungi do not form on them and mold does not start.
Disadvantages of block houses
But block building materials cannot be called perfect. He also has his shortcomings. These include :
- Increased moisture permeability. The material is rich in micropores, in which moisture can accumulate. To avoid such troubles, it is recommended to finish the walls with plaster during construction. Moreover, finishing is required on both sides.
- All walls are load-bearing. It is impossible to redevelop in such apartments or private houses, since any intervention will lead to a violation of the supporting structure.
- Brittleness. When a house shrinks, a foam block wall can crack, violating the strength of the entire structure. To avoid this, during construction, it is necessary to use special types of foundations that are earthquake-resistant and do not shrink (from monolithic slabs or reinforced concrete ligaments).
In general, the disadvantages of block building materials are eliminated by certain technical and construction methods. Therefore, they cannot be called critical.
The difference between panel and block houses
What is a block house? During its construction, gas blocks or foam blocks are used, which means concrete building materials with different foaming methods. Panel buildings are built from large slabs.
Both types of such buildings are built from reinforced concrete slabs and blocks, so it may seem that there is no difference between them. But in reality, the difference is significantly manifested during the operation of such housing.
How to distinguish a panel house from a block house? Panel buildings look like a solid monolith, and block buildings look like brickwork, only the size of the blocks is much larger than brick.
What is the difference between a block house and a panel house:
- The difference in wall thickness. Thanks to internal reinforcement, panel walls are able to carry the same load as blocks. In this case, the thickness of the plate should be 140-180 mm, and the block – 400 mm.
- Various fastening methods. The panels are fastened to each other with metal welded fasteners, and the blocks are laid out on a cement-sand mixture.
- Projects of buildings. In panel houses, the dwellings are more spacious, the rooms have a large area. But the walls in panel structures are almost all load-bearing, therefore it is almost impossible to carry out redevelopment in such an apartment.
The main problem of prefabricated buildings is depressurization at the joints of the outer panels, which is fraught with the formation of mold and fungi. But when using an effective insulation, freezing does not occur.
Comparison of block design with monolithic
A lot of questions arise when compared with monolithic buildings . Which house is better – monolithic or block. Monolithic buildings are built on the basis of reinforced concrete materials.
Such structures are poured immediately at the construction site, and therefore they do not have seams. In monolithic buildings there are no bearing walls, so in such apartments it is easy to carry out redevelopment.
The advantages of a monolithic structure include:
- fast erection;
- slight shrinkage;
- high strength;
- in comparison with other types of buildings, the monolith has a small weight, therefore such buildings can be erected on heaving soils;
- uniform load distribution;
- waterproof and durable;
- earthquake resistance.
Among the shortcomings of such buildings, experts note the high cost, the impossibility of winter construction and the need for additional insulation.
Also, the disadvantages of monolithic buildings include negative sound insulation, the mandatory installation of additional ventilation systems and the need for uniform pouring of the concrete mixture (which requires high professionalism).
Brick and block houses
Brick construction is considered the most common, but in recent years it has become extremely expensive to build buildings from such building materials. Moreover, it takes a very long time to build brick houses.
For example, to build a high-rise building, it will take about one and a half to two years, which is twice as long as panel buildings, and 30% longer than the time of monolithic construction. Therefore, modern brick buildings are considered premium housing .
Brick buildings have the best sound and heat insulation. In such buildings, the formation of fungi and mold is excluded, since the building material gives off and absorbs moisture, and its maximum service life is 150 years.
What is better, block or brick house? It is believed that housing in brick houses is the best option, because the material is more heat-resistant and durable.
Housing in a block house: to buy or not
Potential home buyers often face the question of whether to buy an apartment in block houses. If we compare such buildings with panel ones, then the latter have much more disadvantages.
Block construction technology in the 1970s and 2022 is very different. If earlier in houses from blocks many minuses were revealed, now it is affordable and cost-effective housing. It is more accessible than in brick and monolithic buildings.
If there is not enough for luxury housing in a brick house, which is considered the best option, then a block house will be a good solution for buying your own apartment.